Religion Has No Place in Government Subsidized Day Cares-If Quebec Government Is Striving For Secular Society, It Should Remove Funding From Any And All Religious Institutions
And dear Tommy is all livid over religion, “secular fundamentalism”, he calls it. Is there even such a term? I doubt it. but I find it is he, who’s outrage is misplaced. If I may go off topic for a moment, I have another question for the old tea-partier of CJAD. How come he isn’t equally as passionate about, say, anti-bullying campaigns in schools? Now here’s something that should be taught to kids at a very young age, say, in a day care? . Bullying is a very real problem in schools these days. In fact, sometimes, it leads some kids to commit suicide. There was a teen who committed suicide due to bullying in the news, recently. Hmmm, not teaching the existance of God is more tragic than than bullying? Tolerance of other children around them and anti-bullying. Teaching them how to behave toward each other. That is far more important than saying grace before eating an apple or telling the child care worker that “Jesus loves me”; those acts certainly won’t prevent bullying, nor would they teach tolerance of others around them, that’s for sure. Speaking of anti-bullying and tolerance, go visit The Tolerance Foundation Site, where Anne Lagace Dowson is now the Director General and President. So, why is Tea-baggin’ Tommy far more ga ga giddy over religion instead of anti-bullying and tolerance? Granted that wasn’t today’s topic, but I would like to see more topics like bullying that is more relevant to today’s society and less about religion.
All that said, the Quebec government is not entirely blameless here. They now have inspectors, visiting day cares, to make sure religion of any kind is not being taught, being paid for, of course by the tax payers. While I believe that the government does have a say in how a subsidized day care is being run, the inspectors are an expense the tax payers can ill-afford, while our infrastructure is crumbling, our universal health care system is badly in need of funding as does public education. No, I see a far simpler and cheaper solution here, for both the parents who are just ga ga giddy for religious indoctrination (or should I say brain washing) of their toddlers in day care and the government. The government should just simply not subsidize day cares with any hint of a religious theme to them. Voila! Parents should realize that they can’t have their cake and eat it too. Day cares held in churches/synagogues/mosques or in parochial schools should already be seen to be obviously teaching religion. Cut the subsidy! If parents want or need to put their kid in a government subsidized day care, then they should realize that this day care will and must follow a government prescribed program. Quid pro quo. If they want a religious themed day care, then pay for it out of their own pockets.
This brings me to my next point. Many in Montreal would remember how Loyola High School, a Jesuit private (or I should say semi-private) school that receives government subsidies, didn’t want to add the now mandatory course of ethics and world religions. As a Jesuit school, it only wanted to teach Catholic doctrine. Many Chassidic and other Jewish private schools in Quebec are also subsidized, as are other parochial schools of other denominations. Stop subsidizing ‘em! That money can be better spent in the public school system. If we’re to promote a secular society, then the government should not spend one dime to subsidize any religious institution.
Another thing it’s high time the Quebec government should do. While promoting a secular society is the way to go, they should lead by example, and follow at least one recommendation from the Bouchard-Taylor Commission on “Reasonable Accommodation”: they should remove the crucifix from the National Assembly.
Page 2 of 2 | Previous page
Alison S:
October 18th, 2011 at 12:25 PM
Well said, CK.