Ladies! Pay Attention, Now, Once Again, Lessons in Feminism From Blogging SupposiTory Hunter

Hunter has a somewhat different twist on her usual “Where are the feminist rants?” this time. Perhaps it’s because Princess Sarah Landriault  has somewhere disappeared from the blogosphere and Hunter seems to think it’s her place to take over from her. It ain’t pretty.

Women’s choices are not the same as men’s! The main word, that feminists use endlessly against everything, is that all encompassing word, CHOICE. It’s a woman’s CHOICE to have an abortion. My body, my CHOICE. It gives them a false sense of empowerment. Yeah! I made the CHOICE to kill my baby! Wrong, but that’s only one element to feminism.

Adorable, innit she?  Ladies, did you know that having reproductive choices merely gives us a false sense of empowerment? It appears that in the wonderful world according to Hunter, women who have an abortion feel powerful at the end of it all. Has she met Suzy ALLCAPS yet? The things I learn everyday! However her screed ain’t really about reproductive rights today. In fact, I’m not really sure what it’s about.

Ah yes! Now I know! Hunter is all ga-ga-giddy over an article in today’s Financial Post written by four! Count ‘em! Four women, as commenter mystereoso had observed. Mystereoso, you must realize something, one of those ‘author’s’ is Joanne Marcotte of the Quebec Freedom Network–AKA the Quebec chapter of the Tea-Party; also dubbed by RadCan’s Simon Durivage as the Sarah Palin of Quebec, of course she needed help!  Just sayin’…

 Today we find women in very diverse careers and in traditional men’s jobs: many start businesses; they are found in larger numbers than men in many university programs, they head major corporations such as Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd. and prestigious institutions such as McGill University, and they head spaceship missions to the moon and beyond. Women today achieve great things and can envision the highest levels of accomplishment. But contrary to conventional wisdom, this results not only from actions by feminist groups but also from the profound transformation of the labour market in free societies. In effect, it is due mostly to the technological and industrial progress that brought about a shift from a society where men’s brute force (a biological fact) was needed in the workplace to a knowledge society where almost anyone can sit in front of a computer and generate a decent income

Come again? Were these bimbos suggesting that the only reason men held executive positions like running a university or a major corporation was simply because of their ‘brute’ strength? I bet they still play with Barbie and Ken dolls too.

Were they also suggesting that tireless efforts from feminist groups had nothing to do with career options open to women today?  That the only reason women have the career choices is transformation in labour markets and industrial progress? I say bull-shit!  Without the activism and tireless efforts of women, industrial progress or not, many women would still be shut out of many of these professions and I seriously doubt any women would’ve had a shot at running McGill University or Costco.

Hunter just  found out our deepest darkest secrets, ladies:

Feminists don’t want free CHOICE, they want men out of the picture and all women to be victims, of something, anything.

Commenter, Alberta Girl, once again, forgets she shouldn’t have paint chips with her cereal.  She seems to think we outta be grateful for the economic freedom Stevie Spiteful has offered us; that 60$ (clear after taxes) per month and a raise in funding for REAL women.  Alberta Girl will make a great Stepford wife some day. She could take pointers from Hunter.   

All in all, ladies, that is today’s lesson from Hunter and her little friends over at the Financial Post:  Men are and will always be superior to us on the work force due to their ‘brute’ strength and that stepford wifery is actually freedom.