I guess Rightchik Tammeee’s hubby is away again, because she’s back, with her whining. This time, she sounds like a little girl who’s parents forgot to ply her with Gravol before the long car ride. Yes, add her to the list of big babies whining babies all hot and bothered over the big bad election. She displays her usual ignorance:
I’m angry at the Conservatives for insisting on a budget that the opposition wasn’t going to support. I’m angry at the opposition for not working with Conservatives to create a budget that everyone could live with.
Not only has she been away, but it’s pretty obvious she must’ve been lost, buried in an avalanche of shoes!
First off, it’s more Stevie and Deficit Jimbo who refused to work with the opposition parties on the budget. Your man wanted this election–he’s the one who should own and wear it more than anyone else. Gilles Duceppe called his bluff when he demanded over 5 billion, when in reality, his price tag was less than half; just 2.2 billion the feds owed us in HST payments. The Harpercons further gave their hand away recently in a stroke of hypocrisy during a Quebec campaign speech that they would reimburse us this HST compensation. If they really wanted to cooperate, they could’ve simply added HST compensation for Quebec in their budget in the first place. Spin and twist yourself into pretzel all you like regarding the budget or how Quebec deserves squat as you Connies outside of French Quebec seem to love to do, but that don’t make it less so.
Once again, I will have to provide the lessons. Barbie Doll, dear, the Harpercons didn’t fall over the budget. In fact, they were too busy debating the contempt of parliament issues to get to the budget amendment proposals and such.
They fell over a non-confidence motion; over ethics issues. ‘E-T-H-I-C-S’. Things like contempt of parliament. Nasty, nasty things like doctorinI realize that ethics are a foreign concept to your side of the street, particularly Barbie dolls like you who only think pretty people count.
Know why else your Dreamy Stevie fell, sweetie? Secrecy over costs of tough on crime bills, like big-assed prisons and big assed fighter planes that have proven time and again to be problematic in the US. Really rich how you complain about the cost of elections, and being hawkish over your taxes, but you’re just peachy-keen jelly bean about the Harpercons’ pathological need for secrecy on costs of those items I just mentioned. Tell me, sweetie, how does that work?
Oh, here is where tries to be cute:
…but this election has nothing to do with preserving democracy.
I’m not sure what it’s about (couldn’t this have been taken care of in the men’s locker room with a ruler) but I am pretty sure it’s got nothing to do with me, my family or the people I love.
I just bet dear ol’ Rightchik Tammeee would love to be the one holding the ruler in that men’s locker room, wouldn’t she? Adorable! She still don’t know what the election is about! So, I guess the transparency over the costs of mega-prisons for unreported crime and problematic fighter jets that you will be paying for with your taxes has nothing to do with your loved ones?
I guess the final nails in the coffin, courtesy of your man King Steve, has also nothing to do with your family or your loved ones?
Sorry, a pesky little election has to interrupt some valuable shoe shopping time at the mall or gab sessions with your hair dresser.
Kudos to Fern Hill for giving commenter Alberta Girl (she of the ‘Geneva Conventions doesn’t apply to the Taliban because they’re thugs like biker gangs’) a proper verbal bitch slapping.
Popular Posts