small-web-version_harperfree_poster.jpg (image)
|
By ck, on December 15th, 2010
Tweet
Rod Bruinooge’s Bill C-510 AKA Roxanne’s Law, yanno, the one that was based on a lie? The one about coerced abortions? Well, it just died a well deserved death: 178-97.
Eat your heart out, Mr. Lilley (who, by the by, thinks folks who are pro-choice should’ve supported Bill C-510) & the other fetus . . . → Read More: Bill C-510 Falls In the House of Commons–Take That, Brian Lilley & The Other Fetus Fetishists!
By ck, on October 27th, 2010
Tweet
I thought Bill C-510 AKA Roxanne’s Law was dead and had it’s well deserved burial. Guess I was wrong. I’m not rehashing the background. Go here if you want it.
I’m smelling the same tactic that is happening in various states across the border, yanno, the one where the keep chipping away at . . . → Read More: Oh, Motherhood Stevie Spiteful, You Must Be So Proud!
By ck, on April 16th, 2010
Tweet
With everything I’ve been reading lately about this Bruinooge, some Harpercon flunkie and his private members bill, c-510, in the supposed memory of Roxanne Fernando who was murdered in 2007 by her boyfriend. A flimsy way indeed for Harpercons to start the abortion debate; further evidence that one of Brother Steve’s goals would . . . → Read More: I Guess This New Abortion Bill Wouldn’t Work in Reverse, Would It?
|
|