Petey Ignores Karzai: Fine, Couldn’t he Have Couldn’t He Have Phoned it In? Did He Have to Bring Rona?

Ah, gotta love those Harpercon cheerleaders who claim their masters are great with the economy and the opposition parties do nothing but waste the tax payers’ money.

Well, Well, What do we here? Petey is in Afghanistan. And why? No, it isn’t to talk to the on-again, off-again, soon-to-be-again Taliban friend. He decided to do that oh so mature relay his messages to senior Afghan officials:

“I called for more constructive and active engagement. People need to see a more visible presence of the Afghan government in Kandahar province,” Mr. MacKay told the Afghan officials, explaining the President’s comments have a “corrosive impact on Canadian soldiers and citizens.”

Gee, ya think? So, Petey, why are you so hell-bent on even entertaining the idea of keeping troops in Afghanistan past the 2011 deadline? Just what do you, your puppetmaster, and the war president think you’re going to accomplish there?

This leads me to my next question: your boss has already told Hillary as well as pretty much the rest of the world that we’re pulling out in 2011; Petey,  like Ex-Lax Max and Helena, have you gone rogue (no pun intended) or is Brother Steve having you express his truest wishes? After all, nothing pleases him more than do anything for the Americans, including sacrficing lives, but, he has an election campaign to gear up for. Oh, what a dilemma!

Speaking of wasted tax dollars, what the hell was Rona Ambrose doing there? Did she think that that whole minister of public works and minister of state for status of women was all happening in Afghanistan?

Or did Petey simply need a date? In the picture accompanying Taber’s column in the Grope & Fail, it appears that Rona is dressed for a date more than for a government tour of a war zone.

Oh Rona! Sadly typical!  Now I’m even more convinced she’s dumber than Helena.  I guess she didn’t ask Belinda Stronach how Petey feels about women who cross him.  What’s sad is that in all that time working under Brother Steve, she still doesn’t realize she’s being exploited to play the typical conservative bimbette who’s sole purpose appears to be window dressing.

What’s worse is that today’s corporate media likes to portray women, particularly conservative women as just that: window dressing in parliament.